We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy from the information contained on this site, or the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can deliver inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
The main objectives of police is always to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and higher than all ensure law and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The regulation enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair on the offender along with the Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts However they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
Sign up for E-mail Notification of latest opinions The cases listed down below have experienced opinions filed for them within the last 14 days. The following information is available for Each and every case: Information Sheet - Click a case number to view case details, like signing JusticesJudges and participating attorneys.
Therefore, this petition is found to get not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), and also the petitioners might request remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
Many of the volumes (together with more recent volumes than the library's holdings) are also out there online through the Caselaw Access Project.
Within the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court will be the highest court from the United States. Decreased courts within the federal level involve the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, plus the U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts listen to cases involving matters related for the United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that contain parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Every single state has its own judicial system that incorporates trial and appellate courts. The highest court in Every state is commonly referred to because the “supreme” court, While there are a few exceptions to this rule, for example, the Ny Court of Appeals or maybe the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally listen to cases involving state constitutional matters, state law and regulations, Despite the fact that state courts may also generally hear cases involving federal laws.
S. Supreme Court. Generally speaking, proper case citation features the names of your parties to the first case, the court in which the case was listened to, the date it was decided, as well as book in which it truly is recorded. Different citation requirements may include things like italicized or underlined text, and certain specific abbreviations.
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually very well-settled that even though contemplating the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority should look at the benefit of each of the eligible candidates and after thanks deliberations, to grant promotion to these qualified candidates who're found to be most meritorious among them. For the reason that petitioner was held to get senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was overlooked from the respondent department just to extend favor to the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy on the part of the respondent department.
Article 27 of your Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination with the time of appointment of service but after the appointment also. here The disparity during the pay back scale allowances of Stenographers while in the District Judiciary is from the very clear negation in the legislation laid down because of the Supreme Court in its several pronouncements. Read more
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually perfectly-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within ninety days. When the appeal is just not decided within that timeframe, he/she will then solution the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, because the 90 times for that department to act has already expired. Within the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided with the decision with the Supreme Court while in the case of Dr.
In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe like a foster child. Although the couple had two young children of their possess at home, the social worker did not convey to them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report into the court the following day, the worker reported the boy’s placement inside the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the couple had youthful children.
Because of their position between The 2 main systems of regulation, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as blended systems of legislation.
States also commonly have courts that tackle only a specific subset of legal matters, like family legislation and probate. Case legislation, also known as precedent or common regulation, could be the body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending on the relationship between the deciding court and the precedent, case legislation can be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision with the U.S. Court of Appeals with the Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting down in California (whether a federal or state court) will not be strictly bound to Adhere to the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by 1 district court in Ny is just not binding on another district court, but the first court’s reasoning could help guide the second court in achieving its decision. Decisions via the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more